Volatility Decomposition and Mutual Fund Returns

Log in to collect

Onsite backtest IDE

Quant Buffet native backtest IDE

Edit and run Quant Buffet Python for Volatility Decomposition and Mutual Fund Returns in the browser. Results update live with equity, drawdown, and metrics charts. Allowed: backtest.data, backtest.engine, backtest.metrics, numpy, pandas. Define ASSETS and make_on_day(prices). Shortcut: Ctrl+Enter. API docs →

Ready — edit code, then Run backtest.
IDE · 50 lines
Quant Buffet syntax cheat sheet (copy / insert)

Paste these fragments into the editor. The sandbox rejects QuantConnect, os, and network libraries.

Required imports
Only these libraries are allowed in the sandbox.
from __future__ import annotations

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

from backtest.data import load_daily_prices
from backtest.engine import EngineConfig, PortfolioEngine
from backtest.metrics import compute_metrics
ASSETS list (whitelisted ETFs)
Module-level list. Tickers must be in the Quant Buffet whitelist.
ASSETS = ["SPY", "QQQ", "TLT", "GLD", "BIL"]
make_on_day contract
Must return (on_day, ready). on_day calls engine.set_target_weights.
def make_on_day(prices: pd.DataFrame):
    cols = [c for c in ASSETS if c in prices.columns]
    sma = prices[cols].rolling(200, min_periods=200).mean()
    state = {"last": None}

    def on_day(engine: PortfolioEngine, dt: pd.Timestamp) -> None:
        if sma.loc[dt].isna().all():
            return
        key = (dt.year, dt.month)
        if state["last"] == key:
            return
        state["last"] = key
        long = [
            s for s in cols
            if pd.notna(prices.at[dt, s]) and pd.notna(sma.at[dt, s])
            and prices.at[dt, s] > sma.at[dt, s]
        ]
        weights = {} if not long else {s: 1.0 / len(long) for s in long}
        engine.set_target_weights(dt, weights)

    ready = sma.dropna(how="all").index.min() if sma.notna().any().any() else None
    return on_day, ready
Set target weights
Weights should sum to about 1.0. Empty dict = 100% cash.
engine.set_target_weights(dt, {"SPY": 0.60, "BIL": 0.40})

Live backtest performance

CAGR
7.89%
Sharpe
0.63
Max DD
-33.72%
Vol
13.60%
Sortino
0.93
Beta
0.51
Up days
59%

Run the backtest to populate charts.

Export to your platform

Transform Quant Buffet lab code (ASSETS + make_on_day / PortfolioEngine) into native classes for a third-party IDE — then copy and paste.

Run in: QuantConnect Cloud or LEAN CLI · QCAlgorithm with Equity securities and monthly rebalance.

Detected pattern: Absolute momentumAssets: SPY, TLT, GLD, BIL
# Generated from Quant Buffet → QuantConnect LEAN
# Strategy: Volatility Decomposition and Mutual Fund Returns
# Detected pattern: Absolute momentum
# Source uses Quant Buffet lab APIs (ASSETS + make_on_day / PortfolioEngine).
# Review fees, data, and risk before live trading — educational export only.

from AlgorithmImports import *


class QuantBuffetExport(QCAlgorithm):
    def Initialize(self):
        self.SetStartDate(2010, 1, 1)
        self.SetCash(100000)
        tickers = ["SPY", "TLT", "GLD", "BIL"]
        self.symbols = []
        for t in tickers:
            if "-" in t:  # crypto proxy e.g. BTC-USD
                self.symbols.append(self.AddCrypto(t.replace("-USD", ""), Resolution.Daily).Symbol)
            else:
                self.symbols.append(self.AddEquity(t, Resolution.Daily).Symbol)
        self.Schedule.On(
            self.DateRules.MonthStart(self.symbols[0]),
            self.TimeRules.AfterMarketOpen(self.symbols[0], 30),
            self.Rebalance,
        )
        # Logic: Long assets with positive 252-day return; equal-weight; monthly.

    def Rebalance(self):
        # Pattern: abs_momentum — Long assets with positive 252-day return; equal-weight; monthly.
        # Default: equal-weight. Port your make_on_day weights here via SetHoldings.
        w = 1.0 / len(self.symbols) if self.symbols else 0.0
        for symbol in self.symbols:
            self.SetHoldings(symbol, w)

Exported code uses the platform’s native classes and libraries. Install dependencies in your third-party IDE, then run. Validate before live trading.

Academic paper

Mutual Fund Performance and the Sources of Portfolio Volatility

AuthorsNima Vafai; David A. Rakowski

Institute
  • The University of Texas of the Permian Basin
  • ?The university of Texas Permian Basin
  • The University of Texas at Arlington
  • ?University of Texas at Arlington

Screenshot from the original paper

Screenshot from the original paper
Screenshot from the original paper

Strategy in a nutshell

The investment universe consists of all funds in the CRSP mutual fund database. Funds with less than 80% of assets invested in CRSP-covered stocks during the current and previous year are excluded. For mutual funds with multiple share classes, assets are aggregated across classes, and all fund attributes, including returns, are weighted by lagged assets in each class.

Each month, for each mutual fund kkk, calculate the total return variance σ2\sigma^2σ2 using the weighted covariance of all constituent assets. Decompose σ2\sigma^2σ2 into the average holdings’ variance ν\nuν and average holdings’ covariance ψ\psiψ. Compute ν\nuν using daily returns of each security, then derive ψ\psiψ as σ2−ν\sigma^2 - \nuσ2−ν.

Mutual funds are sorted monthly into equally-weighted deciles based on σ2\sigma^2σ2, ν\nuν, and ψ\psiψ. The strategy allocates 50% to the bottom decile of funds with the lowest variance σ2\sigma^2σ2 and 50% to the bottom decile with the lowest average holdings’ covariance ψ\psiψ. Portfolios are equally weighted and rebalanced monthly.

Economic rationale

Financial theory posits that higher expected returns are associated with higher risk. In practice, investors often overpay for risky assets, causing high-volatility assets to be overvalued and low-volatility assets to be undervalued, resulting in lower and higher subsequent returns, respectively.

Following Markowitz (1952, 1959), a portfolio’s total risk (σ2\sigma^2σ2) can be decomposed into variance of holdings (ν\nuν) and covariances of holdings (ψ\psiψ). While diversification reduces ν\nuν toward zero, it does not eliminate ψ\psiψ. Hence, the covariance component ψ\psiψ drives the volatility-based return patterns observed, rather than the overall portfolio variance σ2\sigma^2σ2.

Backtest performance

Annualised return7.89%
Volatility13.60%
Beta0.51
Sharpe ratio0.63
Sortino ratio0.93
Maximum drawdown-33.72%
Win rate59%