The Positive Similarity of Company Filings and Stock Returns
Log in to collectAcademic paper
The Positive Similarity of Company Filings and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns
Matus Padysak
- SKComenius University Bratislava
- ?Comenius University - Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics
- ?Quantpedia.com
Strategy in a nutshell
The investment universe consists of stocks with large market cap covered by the Brain Company, for which stock prices were available to download from Yahoo Finance and had full history during the sample period. Firstly, only the similarity of the positive language is considered. The positive similarity score is calculated as the cosine similarity and is provided by the Brain Company. Each month, stocks are ranked based on the positive similarity language score of their most recent company filing and sorted into deciles. Long the bottom decile and short the top decile. The strategy is equally-weighted and rebalanced monthly.
Economic rationale
Firstly, there are major differences compared to Lazy prices. The presented paper is focused on the similarity of positive language only (compared to the similarity of all language), motivated by the search for the most profitable strategy. Additionally, the holding period is shorter (one month compared to three months), and stocks are sorted into deciles based on their most recent 10-K or 10-Q report. The strategy does not wait for the new quarter release, but rather use the most recent report. The last difference is the investment universe. Previous research has examined the effect on approximately 4000 stocks, which has to include smaller capitalization stocks and possible liquidity issues. The Brain analyzes company reports for approximately the largest 1000 US stocks. As a result, the investment universe includes mostly large caps with better liquidity and lower slippage costs and spreads.
The mechanism behind the functionality is foggy. The hypothesis of the paper is that the effort to change the positive language should positively influence subsequent returns because management does not have the motivation to change report if it would harm the company significantly. It should rather positively influence the potential investor.
Last but not least, results suggest that the low positive similarity effect is a distinct anomaly in the financial markets. There is an economically and statistically significant alpha, and also the change of sentiment extracted from filings cannot explain the positive similarity effect.
Backtest performance
Full Python code
from AlgoLib import *
# endregion
class ThePositiveSimilarityOfCompanyFilingsAndStockReturns(XXX):
def Initialize(self):
self.SetStartDate(2009, 1, 1) # first metric data come in 2009
self.SetCash(100000)
self.leverage:int = 5
self.quantile:int = 10
self.metric_symbols:dict[Symbol, Symbol] = {}
self.positive_similarities:dict[Symbol, float] = {}
self.market:Symbol = self.AddEquity('SPY', Resolution.Daily).Symbol
self.coarse_count:int = 1000
self.pick_largest:bool = True
self.selection_flag:bool = False
self.UniverseSettings.Resolution = Resolution.Daily
self.AddUniverse(self.CoarseSelectionFunction, self.FineSelectionFunction)
self.Schedule.On(self.DateRules.MonthStart(self.market), self.TimeRules.BeforeMarketClose(self.market, 0), self.Selection)
def OnSecuritiesChanged(self, changes):
for security in changes.AddedSecurities:
security.SetFeeModel(CustomFeeModel())
security.SetLeverage(self.leverage)
def CoarseSelectionFunction(self, coarse):
if not self.selection_flag:
return Universe.Unchanged
if self.coarse_count <= 1000 and not self.pick_largest:
selected:list = sorted([x for x in coarse if x.HasFundamentalData and x.Market == 'usa'],
key=lambda x: x.DollarVolume, reverse=True)[:self.coarse_count]
else:
selected:list = [x for x in coarse if x.HasFundamentalData and x.Market == 'usa']
selected_symbols:list[Symbol] = []
for stock in selected:
symbol:Symbol = stock.Symbol
if symbol not in self.metric_symbols:
metric_symbol:Symbol = self.AddData(BrainCompanyFilingLanguageMetrics10K, symbol).Symbol
self.metric_symbols[symbol] = metric_symbol
selected_symbols.append(symbol)
return selected_symbols
def FineSelectionFunction(self, fine):
if self.coarse_count <= 1000:
return list(map(lambda stock: stock.Symbol, fine))
fine:list = list(filter(lambda stock: stock.MarketCap != 0, fine))
if len(fine) > self.coarse_count or self.pick_largest:
sorted_by_cap:list = sorted(fine, key=lambda stock: stock.MarketCap)
fine = sorted_by_cap[-self.coarse_count:]
return list(map(lambda stock: stock.Symbol, fine))
def OnData(self, data):
if self.selection_flag:
self.selection_flag = False
filtered_positive_similarity:dict[Symbol, float] = { symbol: pos_sim for symbol, pos_sim in self.positive_similarities.items() \
if symbol in data and data[symbol] }
self.positive_similarities.clear()
if len(filtered_positive_similarity) < self.quantile:
self.Liquidate()
else:
quantile:int = int(len(filtered_positive_similarity) / self.quantile)
sorted_by_pos_sim:list[Symbol] = [x[0] for x in sorted(filtered_positive_similarity.items(), key=lambda item: item[1])]
long_leg:list[Symbol] = sorted_by_pos_sim[:quantile]
short_leg:list[Symbol] = sorted_by_pos_sim[-quantile:]
invested:list[Symbol] = [x.Key for x in self.Portfolio if x.Value.Invested]
for symbol in invested:
if symbol not in long_leg + short_leg:
self.Liquidate(symbol)
for symbol in long_leg:
self.SetHoldings(symbol, 1 / quantile)
for symbol in short_leg:
self.SetHoldings(symbol, -1 / quantile)
for stock_symbol, metric_symbol in self.metric_symbols.items():
if metric_symbol in data and data[metric_symbol]:
positive_similarity:float = data[metric_symbol].ReportSentiment.Similarity.Positive
if positive_similarity:
self.positive_similarities[stock_symbol] = positive_similarity
def Selection(self):
self.selection_flag = True
# Custom fee model
class CustomFeeModel(FeeModel):
def GetOrderFee(self, parameters):
fee = parameters.Security.Price * parameters.Order.AbsoluteQuantity * 0.00005
return OrderFee(CashAmount(fee, "USD"))