Country ETF Long-Short Reversal Strategy Based on 36-Month Returns with Triennial Rebalance

Log in to collect

Onsite backtest IDE

Quant Buffet native backtest IDE

Edit and run Quant Buffet Python for Country ETF Long-Short Reversal Strategy Based on 36-Month Returns with Triennial Rebalance in the browser. Results update live with equity, drawdown, and metrics charts. Allowed: backtest.data, backtest.engine, backtest.metrics, numpy, pandas. Define ASSETS and make_on_day(prices). Shortcut: Ctrl+Enter. API docs →

Ready — edit code, then Run backtest.
IDE · 42 lines
Quant Buffet syntax cheat sheet (copy / insert)

Paste these fragments into the editor. The sandbox rejects QuantConnect, os, and network libraries.

Required imports
Only these libraries are allowed in the sandbox.
from __future__ import annotations

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

from backtest.data import load_daily_prices
from backtest.engine import EngineConfig, PortfolioEngine
from backtest.metrics import compute_metrics
ASSETS list (whitelisted ETFs)
Module-level list. Tickers must be in the Quant Buffet whitelist.
ASSETS = ["SPY", "QQQ", "TLT", "GLD", "BIL"]
make_on_day contract
Must return (on_day, ready). on_day calls engine.set_target_weights.
def make_on_day(prices: pd.DataFrame):
    cols = [c for c in ASSETS if c in prices.columns]
    sma = prices[cols].rolling(200, min_periods=200).mean()
    state = {"last": None}

    def on_day(engine: PortfolioEngine, dt: pd.Timestamp) -> None:
        if sma.loc[dt].isna().all():
            return
        key = (dt.year, dt.month)
        if state["last"] == key:
            return
        state["last"] = key
        long = [
            s for s in cols
            if pd.notna(prices.at[dt, s]) and pd.notna(sma.at[dt, s])
            and prices.at[dt, s] > sma.at[dt, s]
        ]
        weights = {} if not long else {s: 1.0 / len(long) for s in long}
        engine.set_target_weights(dt, weights)

    ready = sma.dropna(how="all").index.min() if sma.notna().any().any() else None
    return on_day, ready
Set target weights
Weights should sum to about 1.0. Empty dict = 100% cash.
engine.set_target_weights(dt, {"SPY": 0.60, "BIL": 0.40})

Live backtest performance

CAGR
6.57%
Sharpe
0.38
Max DD
-67.75%
Vol
24.38%
Sortino
0.59
Beta
0.99
Up days
41%

Showing saved draft baseline until you re-run.

Equity curve (indexed = 100)

Accent = strategy · dashed grey = buy-and-hold benchmark

2000-022026-0786260
Drawdown
Worst -57.4%-57%
Metrics bar chart
CAGRSharpeSortinoVol|DD|Up%Grey = baseline · Accent = live run
Monthly returns
2021-072026-07 · last 24 months

Export to your platform

Transform Quant Buffet lab code (ASSETS + make_on_day / PortfolioEngine) into native classes for a third-party IDE — then copy and paste.

Run in: QuantConnect Cloud or LEAN CLI · QCAlgorithm with Equity securities and monthly rebalance.

Detected pattern: Momentum rotationAssets: SPY, TLT, GLD, BIL
# Generated from Quant Buffet → QuantConnect LEAN
# Strategy: Country ETF Long-Short Reversal Strategy Based on 36-Month Returns with Triennial Rebalance
# Detected pattern: Momentum rotation
# Source uses Quant Buffet lab APIs (ASSETS + make_on_day / PortfolioEngine).
# Review fees, data, and risk before live trading — educational export only.

from AlgorithmImports import *


class QuantBuffetExport(QCAlgorithm):
    def Initialize(self):
        self.SetStartDate(2010, 1, 1)
        self.SetCash(100000)
        tickers = ["SPY", "TLT", "GLD", "BIL"]
        self.symbols = []
        for t in tickers:
            if "-" in t:  # crypto proxy e.g. BTC-USD
                self.symbols.append(self.AddCrypto(t.replace("-USD", ""), Resolution.Daily).Symbol)
            else:
                self.symbols.append(self.AddEquity(t, Resolution.Daily).Symbol)
        self.Schedule.On(
            self.DateRules.MonthStart(self.symbols[0]),
            self.TimeRules.AfterMarketOpen(self.symbols[0], 30),
            self.Rebalance,
        )
        # Logic: Hold top 3 by 21-day return; monthly.

    def Rebalance(self):
        scores = {}
        for symbol in self.symbols:
            hist = self.History(symbol, 21 + 5, Resolution.Daily)
            if hist.empty: continue
            close = hist["close"]
            if hasattr(close, "unstack"):
                close = close.unstack(level=0).iloc[:, 0]
            if len(close) < 21 + 1: continue
            scores[symbol] = float(close.iloc[-1] / close.iloc[-21 - 1] - 1)
        ranked = sorted(scores.items(), key=lambda kv: kv[1], reverse=True)[:3]
        for symbol in self.symbols:
            self.SetHoldings(symbol, 0)
        if ranked:
            w = 1.0 / len(ranked)
            for symbol, _ in ranked:
                self.SetHoldings(symbol, w)

Exported code uses the platform’s native classes and libraries. Install dependencies in your third-party IDE, then run. Validate before live trading.

Academic paper

Winner-Loser Reversals in National Stock Market Indices: Can They Be Explained?

AuthorsAnthony J. Richards

Institute
  • Reserve Bank of Australia
  • ?Reserve Bank of Australia - Economic Research

Screenshot from the original paper

Screenshot from the original paper

Strategy in a nutshell

The strategy involves 16 ETFs, each representing a different country's equity index. The approach is to invest long in the four ETFs representing countries with the lowest 36-month returns and short the four with the highest returns over the same period. This portfolio is adjusted every three years to account for changes in market performance, aiming to capitalize on the potential for reversal in the fortunes of underperforming and outperforming countries. This contrarian strategy seeks to exploit long-term cyclical shifts in market valuations.

Economic rationale

The study investigates why national stock markets experience performance reversals over years, highlighting challenges in pinpointing a definitive cause due to short data samples, limited country numbers, market integration issues, and the absence of a universal asset pricing model. This complexity mirrors the ongoing debate about price anomalies in the U.S. market. Crucially, the research finds no evidence linking these reversals to risk differentials, dismissing the idea that prior underperformers were riskier based on their volatility or correlation with global market returns or other risk factors. However, reversals were more pronounced in smaller markets, suggesting a potential "small-country effect" or market imperfections. Additionally, the limited impact of cross-border equity flows on correcting mispricings, possibly due to fears of expropriation or capital controls, offers another explanation. The study also entertains the possibility that arbitrage might not fully eliminate price discrepancies due to equities' uncertain valuation, return volatility, and the time needed for market correction. Interestingly, increased cross-border flows might exacerbate mispricings by attracting more momentum investors, further complicating the market dynamics.

Backtest performance

Annualised return6.57%
Volatility24.38%
Beta0.99
Sharpe ratio0.38
Sortino ratio0.59
Maximum drawdown-67.75%
Win rate41%