Geopolitical Risk and Commodities

Log in to collect

Onsite backtest IDE

Quant Buffet native backtest IDE

Edit and run Quant Buffet Python for Geopolitical Risk and Commodities in the browser. Results update live with equity, drawdown, and metrics charts. Allowed: backtest.data, backtest.engine, backtest.metrics, numpy, pandas. Define ASSETS and make_on_day(prices). Shortcut: Ctrl+Enter. API docs →

Ready — edit code, then Run backtest.
IDE · 42 lines
Quant Buffet syntax cheat sheet (copy / insert)

Paste these fragments into the editor. The sandbox rejects QuantConnect, os, and network libraries.

Required imports
Only these libraries are allowed in the sandbox.
from __future__ import annotations

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

from backtest.data import load_daily_prices
from backtest.engine import EngineConfig, PortfolioEngine
from backtest.metrics import compute_metrics
ASSETS list (whitelisted ETFs)
Module-level list. Tickers must be in the Quant Buffet whitelist.
ASSETS = ["SPY", "QQQ", "TLT", "GLD", "BIL"]
make_on_day contract
Must return (on_day, ready). on_day calls engine.set_target_weights.
def make_on_day(prices: pd.DataFrame):
    cols = [c for c in ASSETS if c in prices.columns]
    sma = prices[cols].rolling(200, min_periods=200).mean()
    state = {"last": None}

    def on_day(engine: PortfolioEngine, dt: pd.Timestamp) -> None:
        if sma.loc[dt].isna().all():
            return
        key = (dt.year, dt.month)
        if state["last"] == key:
            return
        state["last"] = key
        long = [
            s for s in cols
            if pd.notna(prices.at[dt, s]) and pd.notna(sma.at[dt, s])
            and prices.at[dt, s] > sma.at[dt, s]
        ]
        weights = {} if not long else {s: 1.0 / len(long) for s in long}
        engine.set_target_weights(dt, weights)

    ready = sma.dropna(how="all").index.min() if sma.notna().any().any() else None
    return on_day, ready
Set target weights
Weights should sum to about 1.0. Empty dict = 100% cash.
engine.set_target_weights(dt, {"SPY": 0.60, "BIL": 0.40})

Live backtest performance

CAGR
0.65%
Sharpe
0.16
Max DD
-87.22%
Vol
27.63%
Sortino
0.24
Beta
0.19
Up days
50%

Run the backtest to populate charts.

Export to your platform

Transform Quant Buffet lab code (ASSETS + make_on_day / PortfolioEngine) into native classes for a third-party IDE — then copy and paste.

Run in: QuantConnect Cloud or LEAN CLI · QCAlgorithm with Equity securities and monthly rebalance.

Detected pattern: Momentum rotationAssets: SPY, TLT, GLD, BIL
# Generated from Quant Buffet → QuantConnect LEAN
# Strategy: Geopolitical Risk and Commodities
# Detected pattern: Momentum rotation
# Source uses Quant Buffet lab APIs (ASSETS + make_on_day / PortfolioEngine).
# Review fees, data, and risk before live trading — educational export only.

from AlgorithmImports import *


class QuantBuffetExport(QCAlgorithm):
    def Initialize(self):
        self.SetStartDate(2010, 1, 1)
        self.SetCash(100000)
        tickers = ["SPY", "TLT", "GLD", "BIL"]
        self.symbols = []
        for t in tickers:
            if "-" in t:  # crypto proxy e.g. BTC-USD
                self.symbols.append(self.AddCrypto(t.replace("-USD", ""), Resolution.Daily).Symbol)
            else:
                self.symbols.append(self.AddEquity(t, Resolution.Daily).Symbol)
        self.Schedule.On(
            self.DateRules.MonthStart(self.symbols[0]),
            self.TimeRules.AfterMarketOpen(self.symbols[0], 30),
            self.Rebalance,
        )
        # Logic: Hold top 2 by 126-day return; monthly.

    def Rebalance(self):
        scores = {}
        for symbol in self.symbols:
            hist = self.History(symbol, 126 + 5, Resolution.Daily)
            if hist.empty: continue
            close = hist["close"]
            if hasattr(close, "unstack"):
                close = close.unstack(level=0).iloc[:, 0]
            if len(close) < 126 + 1: continue
            scores[symbol] = float(close.iloc[-1] / close.iloc[-126 - 1] - 1)
        ranked = sorted(scores.items(), key=lambda kv: kv[1], reverse=True)[:2]
        for symbol in self.symbols:
            self.SetHoldings(symbol, 0)
        if ranked:
            w = 1.0 / len(ranked)
            for symbol, _ in ranked:
                self.SetHoldings(symbol, w)

Exported code uses the platform’s native classes and libraries. Install dependencies in your third-party IDE, then run. Validate before live trading.

Academic paper

Strategy in a nutshell

The investment universe consists of 29 commodity futures contracts across four categories: agriculture, energy, livestock, and metals. Data is sourced from the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME).

The historical geopolitical risk index (GPRH) is constructed using the proportion of articles on geopolitical risks from The New York Times, The Chicago Tribune, and The Washington Post, via ProQuest Historical Newspapers, dating back to 1900. The GPRH data is sourced from Caldara and Iacoviello.

To estimate the GPRH beta, a rolling regression is run:

Independent variable: Monthly excess return of each commodity.

Dependent variables: Change in GPRH (month t – t-1), average factor (excess return of a long position in all commodity futures), carry factor, and commodity-momentum factor.

Estimation window: 60 months with at least 24 observations.

Each month, commodities are sorted into three portfolios based on their previous month’s GPRH beta:

Low: 5 contracts with lowest GPRH beta.

High: 5 contracts with highest GPRH beta.

Medium: All other contracts.

The strategy is long high-beta portfolios and short low-beta portfolios, equally weighted and rebalanced monthly.

Economic rationale

The strategy exploits the geopolitical risk premium, rooted in uncertainty-driven investment behavior.

Investors recognize the impact of geopolitical events (e.g., wars, terrorist attacks) on economic uncertainty and asset returns. As a result:

Risk-averse investors demand higher expected returns for assets positively correlated with geopolitical risk.

Assets negatively correlated with geopolitical risk are viewed as safer and can command higher prices.

This aligns with preference-based theory and the intertemporal CAPM model (Merton, 1973): as uncertainty rises, investors prefer higher-yielding assets to hedge future investment and consumption possibilities. The strategy captures returns arising from these risk-adjusted preferences.

Backtest performance

Annualised return0.65%
Volatility27.63%
Beta0.19
Sharpe ratio0.16
Sortino ratio0.24
Maximum drawdown-87.22%
Win rate50%