Deterministic modelling of implied volatility in cryptocurrency options with underlying multiple…
Log in to collectAcademic paper
Deterministic modelling of implied volatility in cryptocurrency options with underlying multiple resolution momentum indicator and non-linear machine learning regression algorithm
F. Leung; M. Law; S. Djeng
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/38444def9dbd911405f558aa5b85a25e6a4c2a4b
Teaser
Hold each liquid ETF only when its price is above a long SMA; equal-weight the longs, cash otherwise. Universe: BTC-USD, ETH-USD. Parameters: sma_days=200; rebalance=monthly. Rebalanced on the engine's template schedule with 5 bps commission and 2 bps slippage. Because the paper's primary signal (ML, sentiment, or proprietary data) is not available in our public ETF engine, this draft uses a liquid ETF rule that preserves the paper's economic theme rather than a bit-exact replication.
Strategy in a nutshell
Modeling implied volatility (IV) is important for option pricing, hedging, and risk management. Previous studies of deterministic implied volatility functions (DIVFs) propose two parameters, moneyness and time to maturity, to estimate implied volatility. Recent DIVF models have included factors such as a moving average ratio and relative bid-ask spread but fail to enhance modeling accuracy. The current study offers a generalized DIVF model by including a momentum indicator for the underlying asset using a relative strength index (RSI) covering multiple time resolutions as a factor, as momentum is often used by investors and speculators in their trading decisions, and in contrast to volatility, RSI can distinguish between bull and bear markets. To the best of our knowledge, prior studies ha
Economic rationale
Trend filters exploit persistent serial correlation in asset returns and reduce exposure when prices fall below a long-horizon average, cutting left-tail risk. Related evidence from “Deterministic modelling of implied volatility in cryptocurrency options with underlying multiple resolution momentum indicator and non-linear machine learning regression algorithm”: Modeling implied volatility (IV) is important for option pricing, hedging, and risk management. Previous studies of deterministic implied volatility functions (DIVFs) propose two parameters, moneyness and time to maturity, to estimate implied volatility. Recent DIVF models have included factors such as a moving average ratio and relative bid-ask spread but fail to enhance modeling accuracy. The current study offers a generalized DIVF model by including a momentum indicator for the underlying ass
Entry & exit
Entry
On each month, scan BTC-USD, ETH-USD. Long every name whose close is above its 200-day SMA, equal-weight. Skip names still below the average. An empty weight dict is 100% cash.
Exit
At the next rebalance, drop any name whose close has fallen back to or below the 200-day SMA. If the whole book is below trend, go fully to cash. Fills use 5 bps commission and 2 bps slippage.
Market data required
Needs at least 200 adjusted daily closes on BTC-USD, ETH-USD before the first signal is ready. Crypto columns include weekend rows. The lab loads Yahoo Finance via backtest.data.load_daily_prices.
Symbols
BTC-USD, ETH-USD
Frequency
Monthly · Daily adjusted close; signals rebalance on the month change (last available session)
History needed
≥ 200 trading days per symbol (about 10 months), plus a few extra bars so the first signal can fire.
Fields
- Adjusted close (Yahoo auto_adjust)
- Session date index
Credentials
- None for paper and the onsite lab
- Broker or exchange API keys only for live orders
APIs & providers
Quant Buffet Data API
The lab calls load_daily_prices for the ASSETS panel of adjusted closes, then caches CSV so backtests replay the same series.
- Provider
- backtest.data.load_daily_prices
- Auth
- None for paper / sandbox backtests
- Endpoints
- load_daily_prices(ASSETS, start="2000-01-01")
Yahoo Finance via yfinance
ETFs and crypto proxies such as BTC-USD / ETH-USD share Yahoo daily bars (auto_adjust=True).
- Provider
- yfinance → Yahoo Finance
- Auth
- None for public history
- Endpoints
- Ticker.history / yf.download(auto_adjust=True)
Onsite backtest IDE
Quant Buffet native backtest IDEEdit and run Quant Buffet Python for Deterministic modelling of implied volatility in cryptocurrency options with underlying multiple… in the browser. Results update live with equity, drawdown, and metrics charts. Allowed: backtest.data, backtest.engine, backtest.metrics, numpy, pandas. Define ASSETS and make_on_day(prices). Shortcut: Ctrl+Enter. API docs →
Quant Buffet syntax cheat sheet (copy / insert)
Paste these fragments into the editor. The sandbox rejects QuantConnect, os, and network libraries.
from __future__ import annotations
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
from backtest.data import load_daily_prices
from backtest.engine import EngineConfig, PortfolioEngine
from backtest.metrics import compute_metricsASSETS = ["SPY", "QQQ", "TLT", "GLD", "BIL"]def make_on_day(prices: pd.DataFrame):
cols = [c for c in ASSETS if c in prices.columns]
sma = prices[cols].rolling(200, min_periods=200).mean()
state = {"last": None}
def on_day(engine: PortfolioEngine, dt: pd.Timestamp) -> None:
if sma.loc[dt].isna().all():
return
key = (dt.year, dt.month)
if state["last"] == key:
return
state["last"] = key
long = [
s for s in cols
if pd.notna(prices.at[dt, s]) and pd.notna(sma.at[dt, s])
and prices.at[dt, s] > sma.at[dt, s]
]
weights = {} if not long else {s: 1.0 / len(long) for s in long}
engine.set_target_weights(dt, weights)
ready = sma.dropna(how="all").index.min() if sma.notna().any().any() else None
return on_day, readyengine.set_target_weights(dt, {"SPY": 0.60, "BIL": 0.40})Live backtest performance
Accent = strategy · dashed grey = buy-and-hold benchmark. Hover or tap any point for its date and values.
Order records
Export to your platform
Transform Quant Buffet lab code (ASSETS + make_on_day / PortfolioEngine) into native classes for a third-party IDE — then copy and paste.
# Generated from Quant Buffet → QuantConnect LEAN
# Strategy: Deterministic modelling of implied volatility in cryptocurrency options with underlying multiple…
# Detected pattern: SMA trend
# Source uses Quant Buffet lab APIs (ASSETS + make_on_day / PortfolioEngine).
# Review fees, data, and risk before live trading — educational export only.
from AlgorithmImports import *
class QuantBuffetExport(QCAlgorithm):
def Initialize(self):
self.SetStartDate(2010, 1, 1)
self.SetCash(100000)
tickers = ["BTC-USD", "ETH-USD"]
self.symbols = []
for t in tickers:
if "-" in t: # crypto proxy e.g. BTC-USD
self.symbols.append(self.AddCrypto(t.replace("-USD", ""), Resolution.Daily).Symbol)
else:
self.symbols.append(self.AddEquity(t, Resolution.Daily).Symbol)
self.Schedule.On(
self.DateRules.MonthStart(self.symbols[0]),
self.TimeRules.AfterMarketOpen(self.symbols[0], 30),
self.Rebalance,
)
# Logic: Long assets where close > SMA(200); equal-weight; monthly.
def Rebalance(self):
longs = []
for symbol in self.symbols:
hist = self.History(symbol, 200 + 5, Resolution.Daily)
if hist.empty: continue
close = hist["close"].unstack(level=0).iloc[:, 0] if hasattr(hist["close"], "unstack") else hist["close"]
if len(close) < 200: continue
if float(close.iloc[-1]) > float(close.iloc[-200:].mean()):
longs.append(symbol)
weight = 1.0 / len(longs) if longs else 0.0
for symbol in self.symbols:
self.SetHoldings(symbol, weight if symbol in longs else 0.0)
Exported code uses the platform’s native classes and libraries. Install dependencies in your third-party IDE, then run. Validate before live trading.