Changes in Ownership Breadth Predict Performance of Equity Factors

Log in to collect

Onsite backtest IDE

Quant Buffet native backtest IDE

Edit and run Quant Buffet Python for Changes in Ownership Breadth Predict Performance of Equity Factors in the browser. Results update live with equity, drawdown, and metrics charts. Allowed: backtest.data, backtest.engine, backtest.metrics, numpy, pandas. Define ASSETS and make_on_day(prices). Shortcut: Ctrl+Enter. API docs →

Ready — edit code, then Run backtest.
IDE · 36 lines
Quant Buffet syntax cheat sheet (copy / insert)

Paste these fragments into the editor. The sandbox rejects QuantConnect, os, and network libraries.

Required imports
Only these libraries are allowed in the sandbox.
from __future__ import annotations

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

from backtest.data import load_daily_prices
from backtest.engine import EngineConfig, PortfolioEngine
from backtest.metrics import compute_metrics
ASSETS list (whitelisted ETFs)
Module-level list. Tickers must be in the Quant Buffet whitelist.
ASSETS = ["SPY", "QQQ", "TLT", "GLD", "BIL"]
make_on_day contract
Must return (on_day, ready). on_day calls engine.set_target_weights.
def make_on_day(prices: pd.DataFrame):
    cols = [c for c in ASSETS if c in prices.columns]
    sma = prices[cols].rolling(200, min_periods=200).mean()
    state = {"last": None}

    def on_day(engine: PortfolioEngine, dt: pd.Timestamp) -> None:
        if sma.loc[dt].isna().all():
            return
        key = (dt.year, dt.month)
        if state["last"] == key:
            return
        state["last"] = key
        long = [
            s for s in cols
            if pd.notna(prices.at[dt, s]) and pd.notna(sma.at[dt, s])
            and prices.at[dt, s] > sma.at[dt, s]
        ]
        weights = {} if not long else {s: 1.0 / len(long) for s in long}
        engine.set_target_weights(dt, weights)

    ready = sma.dropna(how="all").index.min() if sma.notna().any().any() else None
    return on_day, ready
Set target weights
Weights should sum to about 1.0. Empty dict = 100% cash.
engine.set_target_weights(dt, {"SPY": 0.60, "BIL": 0.40})

Live backtest performance

CAGR
6.00%
Sharpe
0.63
Max DD
-18.15%
Vol
10.11%
Sortino
0.93
Beta
0.35
Up days
50%

Run the backtest to populate charts.

Export to your platform

Transform Quant Buffet lab code (ASSETS + make_on_day / PortfolioEngine) into native classes for a third-party IDE — then copy and paste.

Run in: QuantConnect Cloud or LEAN CLI · QCAlgorithm with Equity securities and monthly rebalance.

Detected pattern: Absolute momentumAssets: SPY, TLT, GLD, BIL
# Generated from Quant Buffet → QuantConnect LEAN
# Strategy: Changes in Ownership Breadth Predict Performance of Equity Factors
# Detected pattern: Absolute momentum
# Source uses Quant Buffet lab APIs (ASSETS + make_on_day / PortfolioEngine).
# Review fees, data, and risk before live trading — educational export only.

from AlgorithmImports import *


class QuantBuffetExport(QCAlgorithm):
    def Initialize(self):
        self.SetStartDate(2010, 1, 1)
        self.SetCash(100000)
        tickers = ["SPY", "TLT", "GLD", "BIL"]
        self.symbols = []
        for t in tickers:
            if "-" in t:  # crypto proxy e.g. BTC-USD
                self.symbols.append(self.AddCrypto(t.replace("-USD", ""), Resolution.Daily).Symbol)
            else:
                self.symbols.append(self.AddEquity(t, Resolution.Daily).Symbol)
        self.Schedule.On(
            self.DateRules.MonthStart(self.symbols[0]),
            self.TimeRules.AfterMarketOpen(self.symbols[0], 30),
            self.Rebalance,
        )
        # Logic: Long assets with positive 252-day return; equal-weight; monthly.

    def Rebalance(self):
        # Pattern: abs_momentum — Long assets with positive 252-day return; equal-weight; monthly.
        # Default: equal-weight. Port your make_on_day weights here via SetHoldings.
        w = 1.0 / len(self.symbols) if self.symbols else 0.0
        for symbol in self.symbols:
            self.SetHoldings(symbol, w)

Exported code uses the platform’s native classes and libraries. Install dependencies in your third-party IDE, then run. Validate before live trading.

Academic paper

Changes in Ownership Breadth and Anomaly Returns

AuthorsYangru Wu; Weike Xu

Institute
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
  • NLRutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
  • ?Rutgers University, Newark - School of Business - Department of Finance & Economics
  • Clemson University
  • ?Clemson University - Department of Finance

Screenshot from the original paper

Screenshot from the original paper
Screenshot from the original paper

Strategy in a nutshell

The strategy targets all NYSE, AMEX, and NASDAQ common stocks, excluding firms with share prices below $1 and financial sector firms. Using data from CRSP, Compustat, and Thomson Reuters 13f filings, stocks are sorted into terciles based on quarterly changes in institutional ownership breadth. Within each tercile, stocks are further sorted into quintiles according to 11 anomaly variables: asset growth, failure probability, gross profitability, investment-asset ratio, long-term equity issuance, momentum, net operating assets, net payout, net stock issuance, operating accruals, o-score, and return on assets. The long leg consists of stocks with the highest anomaly scores in the top ownership breadth change tercile, while the short leg consists of stocks with the lowest anomaly scores in the bottom ownership breadth change tercile. Portfolios are value-weighted and rebalanced quarterly, with a two-month lag applied to ensure tradability.

Economic rationale

The strategy exploits signals from informed institutional investors. Changes in ownership breadth indicate entries and exits of well-informed investors, predicting future stock returns. Evidence supports the informed trading hypothesis, as controlling for future earnings surprises removes the predictive power of breadth changes. Short-selling constraints explain only part of the negative alpha for short positions and are otherwise insignificant.

Backtest performance

Annualised return6.00%
Volatility10.11%
Beta0.35
Sharpe ratio0.63
Sortino ratio0.93
Maximum drawdown-18.15%
Win rate50%